中国古代四大发明(套装共4册) pdf mobi txt 2024 电子版 下载

暂无相关简介，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关目录，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关内容，正在全力查找中

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：中国古代四大发明(套装共4册)在线阅读

在线听书地址：中国古代四大发明(套装共4册)在线收听

在线购买地址：中国古代四大发明(套装共4册)在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

暂无其它内容！

• 作者：江湖相望 发布时间：2023-07-14 22:18:24

  除了装帧精美，这个版本的翻译没啥可取，让人失望。

• 作者：魔云兽 发布时间：2020-04-02 12:32:15

  非常完美的科普书！普利策奖得主太厉害了。如果我像回形针那样会做视频的话就好了。开篇这个引言的结构，非常有视频脚本的感觉，可以直接拿来当配词。看这些文字本身脑子里就会有帝国时代或者是城市天际线那种游戏的建造动画的感觉。这个引言，非常天才，把建筑（这种我们看起来没什么变化的东西）的历史性的发展和变化都讲得清清楚楚。人类如何磕磕碰碰又如何动脑筋提高居住环境讲透了。正文部分则摘选一些建筑史上具有代表性的案例来讲解。这些案例像项链上的珍珠，串起来变成一个大概完整的建筑发展史诗。整本书的剖面插画是一大亮点，看得真是超爽，有非常好的视觉感受，直观、身临其境，感觉不可思议。这种画面特别适合制作成那种3D动画。这书不仅适合对建筑有兴趣的人，事实上它背后那种讨论方式，思考问题的视角适合每一个热爱思考的读者！

• 作者：小小猪 发布时间：2010-01-12 23:08:27

  孔教授看来真是有时间 难为他为我们挑了一本语录

• 作者：失止怅失 发布时间：2023-12-01 03:34:42

  辽宁专辑#冥冥之中自有天意

• 作者：空气补给 发布时间：2022-07-09 22:55:17

  2022.7.9

  不太喜欢文言文风格的翻译。后面几个故事的标题很剧透。

• 作者：水岸風堤 发布时间：2019-06-22 08:30:57

  平明送客楚山孤，客字能错成容，编辑可以自裁去了。并且蓝皮掉色儿，太讨厌了。

• 在位时间长的皇帝通病

  作者：我醉君复樂 发布时间：2019-04-01 11:11:28

  孙权一生和大部分在位时间长的皇帝一样，前期励精图治，后期就开始犯很多大错误。大抵来说只能功过相抵，功在帝王之术任用贤能收买人心，周泰解衣我都要看哭了好吗，过在后期废立太子上，分裂了统治集团，这动摇了国之根本，为那些明知不能干预废立太子却还是以死相谏的大臣们，都是抱着国家利益的忠臣。

• From Publishers Weekly

  作者：coldog 发布时间：2010-02-17 19:47:19

  Freeman repeats an oft-told tale of the rise of Christianity and the supposed demise of philosophy in a book that is fascinating, frustrating and flawed. He contends that as the Christian faith developed in the first four centuries it gradually triumphed over the reigning Hellenistic and Roman philosophies. Christianity's power culminated when Constantine declared it the official state religion in 312. Freeman points to Ambrose, the bishop of Milan, as the figure who showed Constantine that the bishopric could wield power over the state. From then until the Middle Ages, Freeman argues, the church ruled triumphant, successfully squelching any challenges to its religious and political authority. Yet Freeman (The Greek Achievement) fails to show that faith became totally dominant over reason. First, he asserts that Paul of Tarsus, whom many think of as the founder of Christianity, condemned the Hellenistic philosophy of his time. Freeman is wrong about this, for the rhetorical style and the social context of Paul's letters show just how dependent he was on the philosophy around him. Second, Freeman glosses over the tremendous influence of Clement of Alexandria's open embrace of philosophy as a way of understanding the Christian faith. Third, the creeds that the church developed in the fourth century depended deeply on philosophical language and categories in an effort to make the faith understandable to its followers. Finally, Augustine's notions of original sin and the two cities depended directly on Plato's philosophy; Augustine even admits in the Confessions that Cicero was his model. While Freeman tells a good story, his arguments fail to be convincing.