Power, politics and religion in Timurid Iran伊朗的权力、政治和宗教 pdf mobi txt 2024 电子版 下载

　　Beatrice Forbes Manz uses the history of Iran under the Timurid ruler Shahrukh (1409-1447) to analyze the relationship between government and society in the medieval Middle East. She provides a rich portrait of Iranian society over an exceptionally broad spectrum - the dynasty and its servitors, city elites and provincial rulers, and the religious classes, both ulama' and Sufi. The work addresses two issues central to pre-modern Middle Eastern history: how a government without the monopoly of force controlled a heterogeneous society, and how a society with diffuse power structures remained stable over long periods. Written for an audience of students as well as scholars, this book provides the first broad analysis of political dynamics in late medieval Iran and challenges much received wisdom about civil and military power, the relationship of government to society, and the interaction of religious figures with the ruling class.

List of maps

Preface

Chronology

Family tree of major Timurid princes

Introduction

1 The formation of the Timurid state under Shahrukh

2 Issues of sources and historiography

3 Shahrukh’s dīwān and its personnel

4 Political and military resources of Iran

5 Timurid rule in southern and central Iran

6 Political dynamics in the realm of the supernatural

7 The dynasty and the politics of the religious classes

8 The rebellion of Sultan Muhammad b. Baysunghur and the struggle over succession

Conclusion

Bibliography

Index

Beatrice Forbes Manz is Associate Professor of History at Tufts University, Massachusetts. Her previous publications include The Rise and Fall of Tamerlane (1989) and, as editor, Studies on Chinese and Islamic Central Asia (1995).

暂无出版社相关信息，正在全力查找中！

暂无相关书籍摘录，正在全力查找中！

在线阅读地址：Power, politics and religion in Timurid Iran伊朗的权力、政治和宗教在线阅读

在线听书地址：Power, politics and religion in Timurid Iran伊朗的权力、政治和宗教在线收听

在线购买地址：Power, politics and religion in Timurid Iran伊朗的权力、政治和宗教在线购买

暂无原文赏析，正在全力查找中！

编辑推荐

　　The first full history of Iran in the early fifteenth century, under the Timurids, a Turkic dynasty of nomadic origin. Beatrice Forbes Manz gives a vivid portrait of society in court, city and countryside, and challenges much received wisdom concerning the relationship between government and society in the medieval Middle East.

• 作者：莫克夏 发布时间：2018-01-05 14:45:41

  难得的一段佳话。从扬之水先生的古器物考证、廉萍老师的红楼点评开始一见倾心，钦慕已久。却没想到两位有此交集，实在惊喜。本来已经对形形色色的日历无甚兴趣，但这本收了，作为个人阅读史的纪念

• 作者：寧見 发布时间：2021-07-25 01:18:31

  看的昌明文库版本，应该是同一版内容。作者是雪堂先生孙女，所以很多处都感觉带着情绪想平反的意思，不过虽然不太认同这种情绪，但凭直觉我大部分认同作者的观点，包括罗对王的逼债以及罗靠出版致富的反驳。书中很多内容引自雪堂和其孙罗继祖先生的著作，也有前后重复者，确实如后记所说，是匆匆草成。毕竟雪堂经历著述太庞杂，评传想面面俱到想必非常困难。

• 作者：朝颜 发布时间：2024-05-02 14:01:50

  看了一遍 挺有意思的

• 作者：格物鹿 发布时间：2022-03-20 13:39:37

  真是暧昧不清的语言啊……

• 作者：Elaine 发布时间：2019-09-29 11:32:36

  读到一半就放弃了… 内容太平 没有看见任何的超越前人之所在 实在没必要读 不过也许定位就是普及读物吧

• 作者：T044107 发布时间：2022-09-29 22:57:10

  独特的孙氏幽默，作者丰富的想象中夹杂着对现实的折射十分耐人寻味。

• 喟然伤心肝

  作者：HANA 发布时间：2012-10-12 12:31:17

• 林语堂的些许偏见

  作者：剪花水 发布时间：2007-07-03 09:43:16

      《武则天正传》最成功的地方，莫过于用了一个李唐氏后裔的口吻来写。毫无疑问，李唐后人无一不对武则天的“篡权”行为恨之入骨，林语堂也可借李氏后人之口，将自己对武则天的恨、厌表达得淋漓尽致、恰如其分又理所应当。

      通篇对武则天的定性大多是残暴、淫荡、恶毒、残忍等评语，的确武则天确有这些特点，但是为何看不到她的优点呢？为何这些特点放在男性统治者身上就是理所应当，而放在女性统治者身上就是大逆不道？李世民不也曾杀掉自己的亲兄弟吗，为何却对他一味尊崇？皆因说话人是李氏后人。

      类似的偏见又现于《苏东坡传》中。虽然这部传记历来为众多评论家评为“苏东坡传记中最好的一部”，但我看过之后记忆犹新的却是对王安石的抨击。文中对苏轼的褒与对王安石的贬形成了鲜明的对比。不知是否是林先生太仰慕苏轼的为人与为文，所以将与苏轼有政见之争的王安石打入了十八层地狱？

      相似的差异又出现在《京华烟云》里，完美的姚木兰与没有一处优点的牛素云，又是一对褒与贬的绝对搭配。

      目前看过的林先生的著作仅此三部，却总能见到他对人的认识，或者说态度的一些偏见或者说是极端的评语。还好林先生不是搞历史的，不然他的态度真的很影响研究。